Infrastructure for disciplined litigation finance.

How It Works

One platform for the two workflows counsel actually needs.

INDIVIDUAL CASE EVALUATION

Evaluate and structure a single case for funding.

Submit through a structured intake built around what funders evaluate. Every case receives a CaseFin Rating — a Case Strength grade and a Funding Readiness score across eight weighted factors. Strengthen the case, and the Rating re-derives. When it’s ready, export a Funding Brief.

PORTFOLIO CONSTRUCTION

Assemble a portfolio that funders evaluate as a unit.

Portfolio financing is where institutional capital is headed. CaseFin is how counsel gets there: import an existing pipeline, score diversification and correlation across the portfolio, model capital deployment, and export a Portfolio Funding Brief with an AI-generated investment thesis grounded in the actual composition.

The CaseFin Rating

How a litigation matter gets expressed in terms a funder can underwrite.

Two axes. Eight factors. Every weight published, every score evidence-linked, every factor explained. AI-assisted, not black-box.

Case Strength A–F
  1. Legal Merits
  2. Collectability & Enforcement
  3. Damages Potential
  4. Procedural Posture & Forum
Funding Readiness 1–5
  1. Counsel & Team
  2. Evidence Quality
  3. Funding Fit
  4. Duration / Cost Risk

Full weights, descriptions, and methodology: The CaseFin Rating.

Portfolio

Institutional funding is moving toward portfolios. Counsel has no construction layer for it.

The infrastructure gap is simple. Funders have internal portfolio construction tools. Advisors have relationships and spreadsheets. Counsel has neither. CaseFin closes that gap.

01

Import your pipeline

A firm with twenty matters and a spreadsheet has a scored portfolio in minutes. Upload a CSV or Excel file. CaseFin maps columns, parses party names, and imports the full pipeline.

02

Score the portfolio as a unit

Individual case quality is only part of the picture. CaseFin evaluates diversification across five dimensions, detects correlation between cases that share risk factors, and models capital deployment against the target facility. A portfolio where every case is strong but all sit in the same jurisdiction with the same defendant is not a strong portfolio. The scoring reflects that.

03

AI-generated investment thesis

Not a template. The AI reads the actual composition, references specific cases, and produces a thesis a litigation partner would recognize as credible. It names the strengths, identifies the real risks, and recommends what to add or restructure before presenting to a funder.

04

Export the Portfolio Funding Brief

The deliverable. A structured PDF with portfolio analytics, individual case summaries within portfolio context, the investment thesis, and the risk assessment. The document counsel takes to a funder when seeking a facility.

Security & Trust

Built for discretion. Designed for credibility.

Litigation details are sensitive. The platform is built around that constraint, not in spite of it.

  • Permissioned access at every stage of engagement
  • Secure document handling with full audit trails
  • Isolated evaluation environments by design
  • AI-assisted analysis that supports, not replaces, human judgment

These are conditions, not features.

Structure once. Present anywhere.

Get Started
UNITED STATESCANADAUNITED KINGDOMAUSTRALIA

Built for the world’s largest litigation finance markets.