The CaseFin Rating

One litigation matter, expressed in terms a funder can underwrite.

A Case Strength grade and a Funding Readiness score, drawn from eight published, evidence-linked factors. Every score reviewable. Every factor explained.

Why two axes

A strong case isn’t the same as a fundable one.

Case Strength measures whether the matter is good on its merits. Funding Readiness measures whether it is ready to be presented to capital. A single blended number conceals which problem you have to solve. Keeping the two separate is the point.

A rating is a letter-and-number coordinate. A B2 has strong fundamentals and is near-ready for outreach. A C4 has solid fundamentals but material gaps to close before it goes to a funder. An A1 is the ceiling: top-tier merits, fully funding-ready.

Every coordinate, explained

Twenty-five coordinates. One reviewable framework.

Hover any cell to preview how the eight factors compose into that coordinate. Click to lock the selection. The same color ramp, anchors, and weights drive every CaseFin Rating in production.

CaseFin Rating · Coordinate spaceHover to preview · click to lockTap to explore
Funding ReadinessCase Strength
C3
CaseFin RatingSolid merits with gaps, partially readyA mixed coordinate. The matter has real potential, but both the case and the package need improvement.
Case Strength · A–F
CSolid merits with gaps6.6 / 10

Whether the case is good.

Four factors weight to the letter grade. Together they capture the matter’s standalone merits independent of how ready it is to be funded.

Legal Merits35%6.9

Whether the legal theory holds up. Established precedent, statutory basis, coherence of the claim, and survival of early challenges.

Collectability & Enforcement30%6.5

Whether recovery is realistic. Defendant solvency, entity type, and the jurisdictional path to enforce a judgment.

Damages Potential25%6.4

Whether the claimed range is credible. Proportionality to the defendant profile, supported by standard valuation methodologies.

Procedural Posture & Forum10%6.0

Where the case stands and what that means in this venue. Stage advantage, forum context, procedural leverage.

Funding Readiness · 1–5
3Partially ready6.5 / 10

Whether the case is ready to be funded.

Four factors weight to the readiness score (1 best, 5 worst). Readiness is independent of strength — a top-tier matter with a thin evidence package or an aggressive funding ask is not yet a 1.

Counsel & Team30%6.9

Whether the firm can execute. Relevant experience, practice-area fit, and the professionalism of the submission itself.

Evidence Quality25%6.5

Whether the document package supports the allegations. Relevance, completeness, and corroboration of the core claims.

Funding Fit25%6.4

Reasonableness of the funding ask vs. claim value, defendant capacity, and duration — the calibration between what’s being requested and what the matter can support.

Duration / Cost Risk20%6.2

How long the case will take and what it will cost. Timeline, capital lockup, appeal exposure. Higher score here means lower risk.

Hover any cell to preview · click to lock the selection.
Methodology

Published. Evidence-linked. Reviewable.

Every weight is published. Every score links to the evidence that drove it. Every factor explains what it’s measuring. Counsel cannot edit the Rating — it re-derives from the case whenever the inputs change, which is precisely what makes it credible to a funder. The CaseFin Rating is AI-assisted, not black-box. Funders shouldn’t have to trust the number; they should be able to trace it.

See where your matter lands.

Every matter earns its place on the matrix through published weights, evidence-linked analysis, and reviewable factor explanations.

Get Started

First case free.